In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving public transport,Discuss both of these v

Investments of the government on different kinds of Transport are becoming a highly-discussed topic nowadays. It is generally believed that large amount of money should be spent on construction of new Railways between cities. However, some individuals opine that it is necessary to invest in improvement of existing public transport.
By spending money on building of railway lines for faster trains both population and the government will benefit. First of all, new routes within the country will definitely ameliorate of the state of tourism. Since these developments will have shorter duration and more comfortable conditions for travellers, people will be encouraged to make trips. They purchase tickets afterwards with slightly higher prices because it will be still reasonable due to well-qualified service and better convenience.
On the other hand, these money could be spenв on development of public transport. The first advantage of this is that it will take less time since it does not consider the significant modifications. Furthermore, amelioration of public transport includes Improvement of city roads and measures taken in order to decrease traffic congestion. As a result, the traffic conditions will be improved and, moreover, modes of public transport such as buses or trains will have more convenient conditions, for example, better cooling system or safety kits and equipment. In addition, directing all expenses on present public transport reviews crash accidents since impairments will be repaired.
On the whole, although spending undue amounts of expenditures to build Intercity pathes for trains has its own benefits, I suppose that all costs should be spent on Improvement of current state of public transport because it will be more effective development of life standarts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...better convenience. On the other hand, these money could be spenв on development of public...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, i suppose, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, on the whole, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57818181818 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08196352567 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9787166276 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348106135445 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130381932436 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114135443434 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221160280342 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898497995943 0.056905535591 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.