In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Using public transport to travel around wast territories is getting easier day by day. There is an arguement over what is a better way to evolve it with some people opining that new railway line construction is an option, while others believe that countries have to pay more attenion to existing transport in order to make it better. In this essay, I am going to discuss both viewpoints.
It is obvious that building up-to-date railways for fast trains is vital, since they are specially adjusted for new transport. In my country, for example, several extra ways appeared in recent years, when transportation companies decided to release Talgo trains, which are quite similar to Eurostar trains in Europe. This required the company to construct brand-new railways throughout the country, whith allowed passengers who had to travel long distances to cut down on time they spent to travel round Kazakhstan. Moreover, since these trains were put down on use, the amount of air travellers within the country has slightly decreased, which I suppose has resulted in a decline of air polution in the counrty.
Still, this improvement suggests upgrading trains themselves. With the old ones it would be impossible to advance transportation system to a greater level. For example, those old trains, which used to frequently run in my country before, are supposed to neither to run at a high speed nor to match those new railways. Without renovating them, transpotration companies would not benefit from increasing amount of railway travellers.
To conclude, I believe that transport renovation must go ahead of new railway expansion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 61
- The graph shows the change of average salaries in various spheres of employment in the US over a period of 40 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons 89
- To some people, studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it’s important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history? 67
- friend has decided to switch careers but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, still, while, for example, i suppose
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21292775665 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83020023964 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6752787081 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185638407421 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622379457251 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457511344242 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107547368364 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284038075694 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.