In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, governments in many countries have to deal with lots of challenges in improving transportation systems. There are also two opposing ideas about how they should do that: one group tends to believe that modern infrastructure such as high-speed railways should be constructed while the other thinks that spending money on existing infrastructure is a better way.
On the one hand, nobody can deny the advantages of high-speed trains. As we all know, they are ideal for people who are in hurry and need to reach their destination as soon as possible. Besides, one of the most important benefits of high-speed trains is their large system of railway lines connecting different areas, which gives us the means to travel to other cities conveniently. So, we can realize that the advantages of modern transportation can be observed in several aspects of life.
However, the biggest drawback of the high-speed train is its expense. Absolutely, the more modern it is, the more it costs we have to accept that fact. But in many poor countries, governments cannot afford to build railway lines because they require an enormous amount of money. Therefore, it is more suitable for them to redevelop existing transport systems instead. For example, they can extend ways for motorbikes and cars, combined with improving the quality of buses or normal trains. Furthermore, taking more measures to reduce congestion is also an effective way to help people move more conveniently and save time as well.
In conclusion, I tend to think that spending money on existing transportation systems is a better solution and more suitable for many small countries because of its reasonable cost. After all, governments should do their best to provide and maintain these systems for the convenience and com fort of their citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
- At present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now "one big traffic jam"How true do you think this statement is?What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars? 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company organization.Why this might be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is also an effective way to help people move more conveniently and save time as ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15593220339 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88837828216 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2950985562 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.642857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230660852946 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706327643257 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585119745069 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143595137736 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440730364673 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.