These days, an intense rivalry between the elderly and the younger counterparts for jobs has aroused people’s discussion. It is thought that the elderly tend to face with jobless because of young rivals. Although the knotty problems associated with this situation can be pronounced, they are not without feasible solutions.
There are two primary issues that the older generation has to deal with when competing with the young in the workplace. First and foremost, as a result of age discrimination, older people often suffer more disadvantages when seeking the same positions as young candidates, even when they have similar abilities and qualifications. Consequently, a number of them become out of jobs, which prevents them from meeting basic human needs. Secondly, elderly employees might undergo enormous strains, stemming from the fact that their young colleagues seem to be more creative and adapt themselves to changes at the workplace more effectively than they could do. This may lead to both physical and psychological problems, including heart disease and depression.
Nevertheless, the problems above can be mitigated if some of the following practical measures will be taken immediately by both the government and individuals. The first essential step is that the administration should encourage enterprises to apply the Anti-age Discrimination Legislation in order to protect employees who are 40 years old or more from employment discrimination based on age. Thus, they would be given better opportunities to find suitable jobs and acquire a livelihood. From an individual perspective, older workers should be willing to update their skills through attending training courses. If younger colleagues also help them to adapt to changes in the working environment, older workers will gain confidence and improve their work performance.
In conclusion, there are some complicated problems that result from an increasing rivalry between the old and the young in the job market, and some holistic approaches should be adopted to tackle these problems. This thorny issue can be resolved thoroughly only when concerted endeavors are made by the government and individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the problems above can be mitigated if some of the following practical measures will be ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...gislation in order to protect employees who are 40 years old or more from employment di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55089820359 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06284352101 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.152370803 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17254434172 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558528803707 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419926833146 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106106218899 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208143112924 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.