One of the consequence of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Due to modern technological development in medical sector, there is no doubt that it has increased people’s life expectancy. However, I think that this life expectancy brings about more drawbacks than the other benefit it provide to the society.
Admittedly, there are some basic benefits of increased life expectancy. Owing to better medical treatment many old people have increased their life span period. They are now able to spend more time with their family and able to visit many places of the world. In addition, older people can bring some basic benefit to the state and family. To illustrate, when people live a longer life they have more experience to share with their elder which can be beneficial to the younger one. Besides, they can also provide necessary suggestions in some of the cases if the government needs help.
However, increased life span period put serious pressure on family and government. To give a clear example, although many of the old people has increased life span, most of the people are not able to take care of themselves. As a result, they become burden to the family for their take care. Furthermore, many older people living in society means that the government has to put a lot of amount of money in hospital and pension. In this case the government has no choice other than to increase the tax and this increased taxes create dissatisfaction towards the government.
In conclusion, being burden on people and society at older age downplays any of the positive aspect that better life expectancy brings to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | KHUSHALI SANDIP RAMANI | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | oanhlilies | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | ililmaidatuz | 56 | view |
- Some people think that it is beneficial to do paid work while others think that it is harmful for children What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing paid work 56
- The following memo appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Mer 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- IELTS UP WRITING TASK 1 11
- The bar chart provides information about percentage of divorce in Finland and Sweden between 2011 to 2015 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ore drawbacks than the other benefit it provide to the society. Admittedly, there are...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n also provide necessary suggestions in some of the cases if the government needs help. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...ty means that the government has to put a lot of amount of money in hospital and pension. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95437262357 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64250075089 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7064665971 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269990076995 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947392752938 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592818783206 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168372642369 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573157940069 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...ore drawbacks than the other benefit it provide to the society. Admittedly, there are...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n also provide necessary suggestions in some of the cases if the government needs help. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...ty means that the government has to put a lot of amount of money in hospital and pension. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95437262357 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64250075089 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7064665971 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269990076995 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947392752938 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592818783206 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168372642369 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573157940069 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.