The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Obtaining steeper retribution from those indulged in driving offense is considered to be an ideal method of improving road safety. However, I completely disagree with this statement given the fact that driving related offe nces are due to improper road infrastructures and the failure of the government to implement an oversight on what is essential to improve road safety.
From my point of view, in developing countries like Nepal, where all the vehicles, be it motorcycle or car or bus or truck, ply on the same road, the likelihood of road accidents are high. On top of that, road infrastructures like proper demarcation using dividers or traffic signals or zebra crossings are severely missing from the streets. Zebra crossings have, infact, faded into irrelevance as the re is no provision for maintenance of these significant resources. While traffic lights are planned to be installed, it will take years for them to be seen operational on the streets. Apart from that, public do not use zebra crossings to cross the streets and jay walking is rampant across Nepal.
Government has no plans to separate the roads in which different vehicles run. There have been cases where riders have met accident just as they were trying to evade a pothole. Likewise, terrible road conditions are responsible for most accidents. Hence, the drivers are nowhere to blame when government itself is not taking measures to ensure road safety on the streets of developing countries. Moreover, there are no follow-ups to see if the contractor has been able to build the road of an agreed standard.
In conclusion, if roads were safe and separated for different vehicles to ply, the drivers would have made maximum contribution in driving carefully. Here, it is not the case of recklessness and non chalant driving which results in road accidents but carelessness on the side of authorities in building roads that are safe for all sorts of vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, apart from, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.078125 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85726698252 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7640911722 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170002005366 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559445660964 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580365887906 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10992038856 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069443904672 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.