In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
It is believed that the best way to solve traffic issues is by giving high rate tax for private motor vehicle owners, and the fund could be allocated for improving public transportation systems and facilities. The solution has its own positive and negative sides and the following essay will discuss them in details.
For a number of reasons, charging personal car owners with high tax rate with high tax rate and allocate the fund for improving and developing public transportation brings a lot of benefits for the society. It is undeniable that with the high tax rate, the number of car owners will gradually decrease and traffic congestion problem would slowly decline. As a result, people could commute faster work more effective and efficient and air pollution would be reduced.
Besides that, the collected tax fund could be used to improve and manage public transportation, as a lot of people would change their mode of transportation from personal cars into public transportation. For example, the government could replace of all old subway trains and buses with the new ones which consume fuel efficiently and more comfortable for passengers. Consequently, the budget for public transportation fuel could be reduced and public transportation user would feel comfort in using the facilities.
On the other hand, taxing private car owners heavily have some negative sides for the individual and the society. Firstly, many people live in areas which are not covered by public transportation, such as those who lived in rural areas or countryside. Should there be any public buses or trains that pass through that areas, the schedule might be only once or twice in a day. These people need private cars and if the tax for motor vehicle is raised significantly then it would be a big burden and problem for them. Secondly, it is a fact that automotive industries have absorbed so many employments. As the demand for motor vehicle decreases due to the high tax rate, many automobile companies would reduce their employment number. As a consequence, the country's unemployment rate would be high.
In conclusion, the solution of charging private car owner with high vehicle tax rate to reduce traffic problems has its own benefits and drawbacks. The advantages of the solution are that people could travel faster and air pollution would be reduced. However, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a big problem for those who lived in remote areas, since public transports are rarely reaching them and also cause unemployment issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-12 | anhvu010197@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree? 84
- In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution? 73
- In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution? 22
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279735682819 0.247107183377 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.138766519824 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107929515419 0.0946595960268 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462555066079 0.0501214627716 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0286343612335 0.0437548338989 65% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116740088106 0.122226691241 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0396475770925 0.0403226058552 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83210446249 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00881057268722 0.0326793684256 27% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0925110132159 0.0861772015684 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0418502202643 0.021408717616 195% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.011013215859 0.011925033212 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2548.0 1933.35771543 132% => OK
No of words: 418.0 316.048096192 132% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0956937799 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20517956788 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361244019139 0.374742101984 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253588516746 0.28420135186 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184210526316 0.203846283523 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112440191388 0.137316102897 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83210446249 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.037074148 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471291866029 0.56093040696 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.3810002361 60.7387585426 85% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.2222222222 20.7743622355 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.889379526 49.517814964 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.555555556 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.7743622355 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.814263465372 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 48.5810738969 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.0412371134 1.69124875643 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447025353943 0.332605444948 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118175545842 0.102741220458 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0831352805635 0.0668466124924 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.545893389375 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153347107988 0.148594505496 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178482225984 0.134430193775 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846910168414 0.0742795772207 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416511169457 0.324371583561 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0279221611115 0.0638462369009 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317338486874 0.228012699653 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448198698181 0.058150111329 77% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.