Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?

Essay topics:

Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment?

Picnic make every one cheer up and offer to get wide knowledge regarding certain places like villages or countryside are escalating recently. Nowadays many people are trying to travel such rural areas to visit and enjoy the reasonable climate and heritage. In this essay explain about the pro and cons of such attitude, and elaborate the negative outcome of inhabitants and ecosystem over the fact of knowledge and fewer development.

On the one hand, uncontrolled visit of some scenery in pastoral sites would distract the natural resources, privacy and stability. Mainly, habitat become endangered by the excess use of disposable wastes like plastic bottles and vessels. For example, rivers, lakes and valleys are occupied with many garbage materials and transport development harm the normal surroundings badly reports a famous environmentalist in Kerala, India. In addition, indigenous people may have detrimental effect on their daily lives in terms of safe, security and solitude life as well. Like the comments of people from Masanagudi a remote area of Tamilnadu district has face many problem related to trucking and excess vehicles make health problems and sound pollution.

On the other hand, support to the grateful progress achieve benefit not only to the community but also to the environment in some extent. At once, increasing visitors would lead to enhancement of transport facilities and expansion of undeveloped places in rural areas. For instance, silent valley was an unknown place for many years until someone discovered the tourist value of that. Furthermore, many natives has got job as per the development and exaggerating guests. Rural development may also lead to travel and tourism departs with financial growth.

In conclusion, although exaggerating tourist to the small remote places become popular and sustainable development for the community , most of the results shows, that would have negative features to the private life of hosts along with environmental permanence.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-30 tuanah 73 view
2019-05-30 tuanah 84 view
2018-10-25 vishal sachdeva 89 view
2018-07-29 ggnsaini08 73 view
2018-07-29 ggnsaini08 73 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
...a remote area of Tamilnadu district has face many problem related to trucking and ex...
^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r hand, support to the grateful progress achieve benefit not only to the communit...
^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties and expansion of undeveloped places in rural areas. For instance, silent val...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ustainable development for the community , most of the results shows, that would h...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49677419355 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85016991304 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635483870968 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7344263668 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184529319516 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506190002418 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467393976052 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106818485974 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547486733808 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.