Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular. It is a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
Currently, the trend of organizing mass tourism to far-flung destinations is on the rise.Personally, I believe that this development may benefit the lives of local people, yet the negative effects on the environment should be seriously considered.
When the number of tourists increases enormously, this trend will economically and culturally benefit local communities. Firstly, the boom of tourism is likely to create more jobs because many businesses and services will be in operation, so companies have to proactively employ local people to serve tourists, which is an opportunity to generate higher and more stable income for local families, thus enjoying improved standards of living. Secondly, this trend paves the way for cultural preservation because tourists tend to be curious about local cultural features such as lifestyles, cuisine styles and festivals. Therefore, these cultural activities will be promoted and preserved so that tourists will have a chance to observe and take part in these activities.
Turning to the negative aspect of the problem, it is the main reason to create bad impacts on the environment. It is true that the rapid increase in the amount of trash comes from the number of daily visitors. As the norm, famous destinations will welcome thousands of tourists on a daily basis, hence, the enormous number of various garbages is the negative consequences of increasing dramatically and uncontrollably. To be more specific, the development of infrastructure and facilities for tourism seems extremely good and attractive, so the local economy will be affected positively, in contrast, it seems the local environment has to incur losses more than benefits. For example, building for entertainment services requires massive landscapes, so governments will have to proactively cut down many huge and ancient trees which are maybe the signatures of its area. As a consequence, the unwanted decrease of trees and its ecosystems will lead to many negative results in people’s environment such as air pollution, noise pollution, and water pollution.
In conclusion, this trend will create both positive for the local economy and cultures, and negative for their environment and individuals’ health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | minhquanvn | 67 | view |
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your own o 89
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Personally
...o far-flung destinations is on the rise.Personally, I believe that this development may be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll be in operation, so companies have to proactively employ local people to serve...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of trash comes from the number of daily visitors. As the norm, famous destinatio...
^^
Line 5, column 903, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its area. As a consequence, the unwanted decrease of trees and its ecosystems wil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53935860058 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14273273336 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536443148688 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7160709512 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5833333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246256105636 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891092242709 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057104693184 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169072166425 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500770610399 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.