Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in the recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The world dips into technologies and devices and there is a widely-spread concern about helpfulness of the smartphones as some individuals reckon that using phones is detrimental for the health and the state should limit its usage for working people. This essay will provide some evidence of total disagreement with this opinion.
Perhaps the major factor against this point of view could be belonging of responsibility for utilizing of a personal items as it appears that citizens of themselves are responsible for their pastime and condition of health. The great example might be comparison of the law system in question of available quantity of alcohol in blood during driving in Central Asia countries, where it is strictly prohibited to be drunk on the road, and in Europe, where people may drink a glass of wine or a bottle of beer and drive then. This is frankly in relation of other subjects in form of use of mobile phone too. Moreover, this thing is very necessary in plenty of modern professions according to the reason that this tiny belonging replaces the whole computer and assists, for instance, more civil engineers on the constructed sites in checking designs and schemes. The only part in which the authorities should consider contributing to the folks it is informative work in improving awareness amongst the population about threats of technical equipment for the physical or mental health.
Admittedly, people tend to believe that the government could influence on the minds, however, there is not enough due to the reason that individuals themselves decide if some actions are appropriate for them or not. In other words, if a person does not want to be rehabilitated no efforts and restrictions will help.
It is logical to conclude that control measure from the side of the national power system is not viable in comparison with private confident thinking of society in common. Thus, any support from the social institutions will be more effective in the field of information about consequences of the situation.
- The chart below gives information about trends in Internet use by females in the USA in two years. 11
- In many countries, traditional dress and costumes are considered effective ways of maintaining links with the past. How effective can traditional costumes be, in this sense? What other ways exist to help citizens connect with a country’s past? 89
- The best way to educate children is not using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 61
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment.What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 73
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today. What are the causes of the illiteracy in the modern world, and what effect does it have on the people concerned and on society as a whole? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...factor against this point of view could be belonging of responsibility for utilizing of a pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'item'?
Suggestion: item
...ponsibility for utilizing of a personal items as it appears that citizens of themselv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, frankly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12835820896 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86884153038 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594029850746 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.321253006 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.181818182 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4545454545 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124685766163 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044414824044 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367467836548 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669182556983 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240084271289 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.