It is said that mobile phones ownerships have grown significantly nowadays although they may contain the potential downsides on our health and community. Due to this affair, governments should take some action on restricting ownership of cell phones to only work-requirements. In my point of view, this can not be a suitable solution for these problems.
It is no doubt that mobile phones are more than just a high-tech device. They have been the core of the distancing communication as they have been the mean of communication for those who could not get a chance to gather around regularly such as people in rural areas or staying abroad. Besides, mobile phones have other enormous advantages like collecting information supporting for our daily life or acting like a way of entertaining. Furthermore, it can partly replace those gigantic personal computers, bringing comfort for current workers as they no longer need those massive and unpleasant devices.
Also, in term of national security, having a personal mobile phone could help the government raise the safety of the people due to the ability of controlling citizen’ behaviours. These small but advantageous devices have been a vital part in human society nowadays. Moreover, there would be a major disagreement for this law among population as this is a serious invade in personal privacy.
To sum up, restricting ownership of cell phones to those who need them for work can not be a proper formula for this issue. Therefore, the leaders should keep working to find out the suitable solution which might be relevant to human needs.
- Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child s education Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in the recent years despite the potentially harmful effects they may have on our health and society Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, no doubt, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15325670498 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92132466259 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8357142163 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372468304582 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125689575926 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918303161327 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217074076841 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716778109816 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.