Most parents grant children with all things they want and let them do what they want to do. In my view, giving what they want and letting them do things they want is harmful. This essay will discuss the harmful effects caused by this behavior in children's future life.
Firstly, if parents always grant children's wishes, their children will be pampered and selfish. This is because children feel that their parents will always fulfill their demands. When children have reached their adulthood, they will interact with other people. This behavior will not be accepted because in certain circumstances they will even be required to prioritize other people's needs. For example, when children are in their 20s, they may have to work with their colleagues and they need to give priority to their teams' needs first.. If those children act with that way, they will not be accepted in their workplace. Thus, they will not be successful in their careers.
Secondly, providing all children's wants will only make them unable to live autonomously. This is due to their relying on their parents, and think that their parents are able to provide everything. This leads to the loss of struggles and efforts. When children are growing up with these behaviors, of course they will not be able to live independently. For instance, parents get used to buy children all toys they want although they are expensive. As a consequence, children will think they can get anything they want without even doing their responsibilities such as studying and tidying up their beds.
In conclusion, granting children with everything they want is not a good habit since it will make children pampered and selfish; and they cannot live independently in the future.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 72
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...give priority to their teams needs first.. If those children act with that way, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04513888889 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55018826087 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4840766784 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4705882353 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397725076442 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161470281553 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104253447303 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283753624829 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318645249023 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.