People are having more and more sugar-based drinks.
What are the reasons?
What are the solutions to make people drink less?
In the modern society, the consumption of sugary drinks is substantially increasing and some people even have them on a daily basis. Two reasons which are responsible for this upward trend as well as some ways which individual can take into consideration to cut down on the amount of soft drinks consumed.
As sugar-based beverages such as coke and soda are regarded to boost energy, metal alertness, and maintain high concentration, it is predominantly consumed by most of the office or factory workers. Nowadays workers tend to have more and heavier workload than in the past. They are required to have a sufficient amount of energy and mental power to complete all those demanding tasks. Hence, this makes soft drinks become indispensable to them.
Another worth-mentioning culprit lies in social etiquette. As the matter of fact, sugary beverages are always served in parties, and hosts often welcome their guest either with them or alcohol drinks. It is considered impolite if a person rejects such invitation. Hence, they have no choice but to have one or few glasses of soft drinks, and as more parties of different purposes are catered nowadays, more of such beverage are available.
However, there are several ways which help individuals to curb their use of sugar-based drinks. Looking for the consequences of over-consumption of beverages with sweeteners is one of the ideal ways to raise people's awareness and pose fright into them. This makes them proactively come up with different ways to avoid drink too much cokes or soda. Another effective way is to gradually cut down on the sugar level in their drinks or the amount of sugar-based drinks consumed per day. As completely getting rid of such drinks at once is considered impossible, people should slowly reduce using them every day and until certainly, switch to sugar-free drinks like tea.
In conclusion, although people may find themselves consuming more and more soft beverages due to so many reasons, there are methods available to help them balance the amount of them. However, I believe that unless they are patient and have a strong will of staying healthy, it is very difficult for them to start getting out of the charming trap of soft drinks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of household in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult so they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... with different ways to avoid drink too much cokes or soda. Another effective way is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05420054201 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79272993442 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566395663957 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0932961972 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.705882353 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28169652216 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848211331237 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627210899925 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148792116893 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468702425293 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.