People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face. What are the effects of this on.
individual and society as a whole?
Over the last few decades, the lifestyle has changed due to advancement in technology. Today individuals' can do their daily activities within a few clicks at home, such as buying things, paying bills etcetera. However, it has both positive and negative impact on one particular person and the whole community as well.
To commence with, although with the help of various applications now multitudes' can order anything without interacting with another person. But, due to this they become introverted and do not socialise with others. As a result, they do not even perform well in interviews. Consequently, masses' feel difficulty when they have to communicate even for their rights. For instance, in this era millions of people are struggling for basic facilities which are already provided by the governments in several campaigns such as food. Because the masses' do not put efforts to attain they are suffering.
On the paradoxical side, it has similarly merits and disadvantages to the whole society as well. Along with the big corporations now small businesses can also expand their firms through the internet by advertisements. Multitudes' do not have to meet other peoples' and do not struggle with lack of money for advertisements which makes the whole society fairer. However, it can lead to unemployment. Because, initially those work was done by conversate with others today it is replaced by technology.
In conclusion, no doubt, progress in technology has both advantages and drawbacks.Nevertheless, it is irrefutable to say that the internet makes life easier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in technology. Today individuals can do their daily activities within a few clic...
^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ents in several campaigns such as food. Because the masses do not put efforts to attain...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... However, it can lead to unemployment. Because, initially those work was done by conve...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lusion, no doubt, progress in technology has both advantages and drawbacks.Nevert...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...logy has both advantages and drawbacks.Nevertheless, it is irrefutable to say that the int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertheless, it is irrefutable to say that the internet makes life easier.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.292 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1868755859 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6046189263 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174600133037 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527492256376 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442357229986 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886653735842 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631496330669 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.