People in the community can buy cheaper product nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, production’s price is becoming lower than before. While there are some idead against this phenomenal, in my opinion, I suggest it brings about more benefits than drawbacks.
The reduction in the cost cause some disadvantages. Price usually comes with quality. As the result, cheaper productions means it has low quality. For example, to manufacture cheap iteams, producers have to remove some parts of the productions or use cheaper ingredients in order to lower the price. This will cause the sale items to be in trouble: they may breakdown sooner than expected or even break down and endanger customers.
However, the falling of production price benefits people in various ways. As the price goes down, more customer will be attracted to it, which boost the consumption.On the big scene, the boost prompts the development of the production, and eventually it helps the economic rise. For example, a decades ago in Vietnam, car price was relatively high due to the import price and there was a domestic car enterprise. Recently, with the transfer technology from foreign companies, Vietnamese factories are able to produce domestic care, which results in the reduction of car price. More people have bought domestic cars, which contributes to the GDP of the nation. In addition, people are able to buy appliance hich is considered luxury in the past, thanks to the low price. Ten years ago, in Vietnam, a student owns a laptop is rarely seen. Nowsadays, almost Vietnamese students have their own laptop. This trend help people to have higher living standard and in a further view, better life.
In conclusion, despite of the disadvantages, the fact that people can buy cheaper products nowadays has a good impact on our lives.
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport
- People in the community can buy cheaper product nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 56
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others say it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'productions'' or 'production's'?
Suggestion: productions'; production's
...es with quality. As the result, cheaper productions means it has low quality. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...cted to it, which boost the consumption.On the big scene, the boost prompts the de...
^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a decade' or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: a decade; decades
...t helps the economic rise. For example, a decades ago in Vietnam, car price was relativel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14736842105 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81277917461 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2118427698 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2941176471 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152372121652 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536983811967 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711722510847 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118520873813 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791861663716 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.