People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In these days, modern technologies and traveling are at the peak. Individuals have the flexibility in work and can establish their job and live anywhere because of the modern communication system and air transportation. In my opinion, this trend has more benefits than drawbacks.
The negative aspect of this trend is the distance put in the family members. To explain this, the person moves away to abroad from their family for better job opportunity or establish business through air transportation and connected through the skype try to maintain the life. However, connect through digital media is not same as the communicate face to face. Furthermore, it is very hard for that a person to meet his family to every month, only can meet his family in once in year during the holiday. For instance, my uncle is working in Canada, he comes in India only once in every Christmas to meet his family.
There are many positive aspects of this development. Firstly, it provides better job opportunity which enables the person’s standard of living. Consequently, their children and family get access to luxurious amenities. For example, my uncle is also planning to take his family to Canada nest year so his child Harshit can get a better education and high standard of living there. Secondly, to explain, people have the opportunity to see the other parts of world and see the way of living those people. They can learn new languages and culture. For example, eastern people often go to western countries for employment or higher education which enables to explore the see new country, their culture, tradition, languages.
In conclusion, I think the advantages are high standard of living, explore new countries and employment are more valuable than the disadvantages face to face communication barrier and distance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer countries However the governments of richer countries take more responsibility of helping the take more responsibility for helping poorer nations in such aeras 77
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather than on sports Why it is Is it positive and negative development 74
- Some people believe that it is valuable for society to experiment with bacteria and viruses while others feel this is dangerous and should not be done Discuss both views and give your own opinion Use examples and explanations from your own knowledge to su 97
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views a 73
- When designing building the most important factor is intended to use the building rather than it's outwards of appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ct through digital media is not same as the communicate face to face. Furthermore, it is very h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'disadvantages'' or 'disadvantage's'?
Suggestion: disadvantages'; disadvantage's
...d employment are more valuable than the disadvantages face to face communication barrier and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11744966443 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83488733282 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55033557047 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5466600652 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135626168509 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433158177048 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433323332526 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896929652047 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392551770112 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.