People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages

In this tech savvy-era people nowadays have enormous freedom for employment in any place of the earth due to tremendous advancement in technology. And masses can travel thousands of miles from one place to another in just a few hours because of the marvelous mode of transportation. I, however, believe that these phenomena have myriad merits on individuals with the least demerits.

To commence with, in this cutting edge era people can do their work in any place of the world on time. Thus, the lives of the public became much easier than in the past. Earlier civilization had not that much freedom as technology was not there before few decades. To epitome, people in the past preferred to work at office compulsory, however, this is not the case in current time. Moreover, air transportation became much cheaper and frequently available than in the past, therefore people can travel to any country in a shorter time. They can meet their loved one who lives far away in different countries.

On contrary, people are become more isolated from society due to more and more time spending on their work at home. Life of masses is very hectic in today's time and they are not able to spend their valuable time with family. Furthermore, individuals have to travel more because of their jobs and meetings as a result they do not get time for themselves.

To recapitulate, I reaffirm saying that due to extraordinary development in technology and transportation, the life of people is much easier and helpful. This phenomenon has more advantages than disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot there before few decades. To epitome, people in the past preferred to work at ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96577946768 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86138789074 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3325110152 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228075585275 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766075314448 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055485208827 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139410697004 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057830053219 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.