People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
The discourse regarding the rise in petrol prices for means of transport has generated controversy in recent years. Some argue that this measure can tackle serious environmental issues; however, others believe that this is just an immediate solution; hence, it is meaningless. Both sides equally considered, I strongly advocate for the first statement with the following reasons.
First of all, the increase of fuel’s cost can enhance the quality of air. There is no doubt that by putting the rise in gas prices, commuters have a tendency to consume less; hence, the exhaust fumes from vehicles will be less produced. According to an environmental experiment, the majority of emission is carbon dioxide, which is proven to be the underlying root for air pollution and greenhouse effect. That is why if national authorities introduce a high tax on fuel, it can cut down on emission and benefit our air.
In addition to the air’s quality, this solution can prevent our natural resources from running out of non-renewable energy. If humans overuse fossil fuels including coal, oil and natural gas, it can attribute to the inadequacy of non-refillable resources; moreover, there will be no fuel to meet the demand of daily activities in the long run. A satisfactory illustration of this is that in developing countries, particularly in mountainous areas, local people frequently utilize coal to generate electricity and produce fire for rice-cooking. To sum up, the tax on petrol can reduce the speed of fossil fuel’s consumption and avoid the exhaustion of non-renewable energy.
In conclusion, enforcement of price on petrol would be a useful environmentally-friendly transport measure because it can not only improve our air but also avoid the lack of fossil fuels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | mphuong.04 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | mphuong.04 | 89 | view |
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 89
- People think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2421875 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15052079028 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6484375 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9123231046 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118189666741 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456192607489 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338891814269 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650812242909 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319211874343 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.