People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
These days, the environment problem has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for means of transportation should be applied or not is a controversial issue. I totally agree with increasing fuel from the government with its many benefits.
There are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that raising the price of fuel could bring many advantages. First and Foremost, the charge of material is grown up which can generate a good opportunity for public transport to turn back and develop more. The reason is that facing the risk of being forgotten and being pushed to the brink of bankruptcy. Secondly, the increasing cost of fuel helps people limited to purchasing fossil fuels. If this solution is taken place, it will spur an inevitable blessing of removing many searing accidents in nowadays
Nevertheless, the increasing material makes a contribution to addressing a crippling problem which is air pollution. Firstly, when the residents could minimize fuels for their cars or other vehicles in the sense that the emission would be eliminated then leads to getting rid of the congestion. As a result, it is also the main culprit of promoting the quality of the atmosphere that leads to shaping the healthy life of people. Finally, it is understood that people realize easily the importance of the environment. This means that people may provide incentives or organize some events to enhance people’s awareness of protecting the environment.
In conclusion, the government need to implement this method with the objectives which are not only saving the environment but also advancing the good life of people.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 08 2019 89
- some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individuals to protect themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is often said that to become a successful businessman a tertiary education is not all necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion with relevant examples 73
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers Would the advantages of this o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...em has been drawing a public attention. The question of whether is the increasing cost of fuel for mean...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...here are several reasons to explain why many hold a belief that raising the price of fuel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...sing of removing many searing accidents in nowadays Nevertheless, the increasing materia...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16483516484 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89689172126 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2078201334 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263883817009 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809575011529 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657651716406 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139160575422 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803648259967 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.