Some national authorities believe that one solution to environmental problems would be to impose a high price on petrol. I cannot accept this view, and I will give my reasons below.
On the one hand, fuel plays a vital role in our daily lives. While the rise in fuel prices occur, people may be willing to pay for that. Therefore, does this policy limit the numbers of cars and other vehicles? Besides, fuel is the critical component of the national economy. Increasing its cost will impact significantly on the price of others. For example, because of transportation fee, this leads to the rise in vegetables and other goods.
On the other hand, raising the cost could be applied at a certain period as a stopgap measure. Instead, the government could adopt transport policies which could be more effective in the long term. The local authorities in London, for instance, introduced a congestion charge on all vehicles visiting the city centre. They use the money raised to subsidize the cost of fares and to invest in transport infrastructure. In turn, this will improve the air quality in the city, as a result of a reduction in exhaust fumes. Furthermore, the governments have turned their attention to bio-diesel as the alternative to recent fuel. It seems more sustainable policy than raising the cost of energy using for cars and other vehicles.
In conclusion, I do not believe that any fuel raising price policy is better than long term approaches to deal with the environmental problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93280632411 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80239105341 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1596868232 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252983963303 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729111972927 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039328954531 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129785666513 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601450721768 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.