people think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the new buildings.
Do you agree or disagree?
Every item of property has its own life span, which gives rise to an opinion as to whether a building should be deconstructed or maintained once it is no longer useful. In my opinion, such decision is entirely dependent on the values that a particular structure can provide the community.
it is undeniable that there are a number of well-established buildings possessing aesthetic, architectural and cultural values. They may be either symbolic of a country, or integral to the local culture and even highly indispensable in the domain of architecture. Therefore, was the demolition of such magnificent accommodation approved by city planners, then this would inflict an immense damage to cultural heritage or deprive today’s architects of a source of inspiration stemming from the predecessors. More importantly, due to their scenic beauty, many of such historically significant facilities have been serving as tourist attractions, providing wealth for locals. Consequently, it is safe to say that longstanding buildings of this type are much more vital than any new ones that, if replacing the existing ones, can disfigure an area.
Nevertheless, with regard to other old buildings possessing no specific attribute while becoming dilapidated, entire destruction is an inevitable decision. This is predicated on the fact that not only are they low in quality but also poor in conditions, posing an undue hazard on users and nearby pedestrians. Furthermore, should they not be condemned, they will likely be a formidable obstacle to other urban developments. For these cogent reasons, whether they could be renovated or not, they would blemish the landscape and provide no justification for continued maintenance. Replacing them with modern residences will meet the renewed needs of a city.
in conclusion, whether to conserve or demolish a well-established structure is the matter of thorough consideration on a case-by-case basis. A well-informed decision should be made after a careful evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of such action.
- Today people are getting greedy and selfish Some people argue that we should go back to old days and show respect for the family and community so that we can make the world a better place to live To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Important historical objects in museums around the world should be returned to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 93
- Museums and art galleries should focus on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think thay the tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and other consumer goods To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...fe span, which gives rise to an opinion as to whether a building should be deconstructed or m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...structure can provide the community. it is undeniable that there are a number o...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'immense damage'.
Suggestion: immense damage
... city planners, then this would inflict an immense damage to cultural heritage or deprive today’s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ll meet the renewed needs of a city. in conclusion, whether to conserve or demo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5253164557 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39624051083 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3409552472 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141179780132 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449994365051 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475313404226 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080989233816 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245067185917 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.