It is no doubt true that social media are getting more popular and replacing physical interaction between people. In my opinion, the advantages of this phenomenon far outweigh the disadvantages in equal measure.
The main benefit of the trend towards utilizing social media is that it we can keep in touch with beloved ones without geographical distance. Because in the modern era, everyone has own careers, they couldn’t stay at home with their family or hang out to coffee with their friends on a daily basic, hence, this is a good way to connect with others. Secondly, social media offers a variety of internet platforms to serve the demand of people, such as Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook. Moreover, these platforms provide a wide range of amenities that allow us to make calls, send messages, and do photo edits, which can enhance the mental life for everyone. Furthermore, there are many internet-based platforms that allow us to find new friends, or take part in classes without being at exact location. A typical example is that we were all studying at Zoom Meeting during the Corona pandemic. This means if we didn’t have social media, educational activities would not be evolved.
Despite the positives mentioned above, it seems to me that accessing social networks excessively is a negative development for various reasons. On top of that, lacking real interaction limit the time for us to meet with people in person, which leads to relationships could be demolished. Moreover, youngsters have a tendency to addicted social media, they spend more time surfing the internet than their real life. For instant, they prefer making friends from over the world rather than their neighbors, as a result, reducing local social interaction.
In conclusion, Social media provide us with a wide range of merits, helping us connect with everyone. However, real interaction also plays an essential role to maintain the relationship between us.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The graph below gives information abouth the percentage of population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 10
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16719242902 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74845066042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630914826498 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8333158813 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119094743599 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408160181827 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261034081591 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701799203968 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111399130471 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.