People who read of pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree?
There has been many opinion saying that reading does better in enhancing our imagination and linguistic abilities than TV programs. To a certain extent, I agree with this statement, but I also believe that TV shows play a vital role in developing our cognitive skills as well.
It is true that reading greatly enhance our knowledge and imagination. By reading various types of books such as adventure, thriller, fiction, and so on, our mind will be exposed to many new and intriguing things that stimulate our imagination and boost our creativity. On the one hand, books and articles include a diversity of formal words and expressions and furthermore, convey the author's attitudes and feelings. So by reading those written words people can improve their literacy and express their own ideas and feelings better.
On the other side, we must admit that watching TV contributes a lot to our mind and language as well. TV provide various kinds of programs that are illustrated specifically thus gives us a better understanding on the content. Watching appealing and educational channels like National Geographic or Discovery we can not only gain knowledge but also find joy and relax while watching, instead of stretching our mind trying to understand the ideas from a forest of words. Meanwhile, we can learn languages from watching TV as well. There are a variety of channels providing numerous learning materials which help linguistic learners to develop their listening and speaking skills effectively.
In conclusion, I believe that both reading and watching TV have significant impacts on people's creativity and language. That said, it is crucial to take these activities seriously so that we can take full advantages of them.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Write about the following topic To meet the growing need for food to support an increasing population a country should make use of edible insects as a food source However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but harvesting them will als 87
- Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development because this land would be better used for h 78
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...ot to our mind and language as well. TV provide various kinds of programs that are illu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21071428571 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86924001528 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610714285714 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2584484166 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.230769231 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20862562554 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761131704246 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583459999105 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126349716703 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038732183524 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.