A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you

Nowadays, people has been judgmental about remark economic position over the truly worth that a person could have through their different values, which seems to be in the past.
One major reason to give importance to the materialistic and socioeconomic status is rather to benefits people think they would receive if befriend be closer either neighborhood or workplace, that in terms of be at side of powerful persons, for instance, it is dreamed reach for a house beside to people well-dressed and with good earnings in a luxury neighborhood, so that demonstrate the rises in their incomes or social status.

Another point to consider is relative to the values, which become better persons to a society also these people receive more blessings from their communities in any labor they are doing and it is well seeing at the end of all. There are cases when to be rejected could be a consequence of be a person without honesty, and bad manners, in fact, companies searching for personalities with adequate truth-values like a part of soft abilities to hire a good employee, on the other hand, these workers could bring issues with other servers, be impolite with their customers or the company could be robbed in any occasion because of bad behaviors and desires.

Overall, in spite of the point of view of masses, I am opposite to believe that money is the most important worth of an individual and to be a nature person will be meaningless, so values should be well appreciated, whereas, richness and possessions should be in a second plane.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, well, whereas, for instance, in fact, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90494296578 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80669668822 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 20.2975951904 256% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.781308529 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 258.0 106.682146367 242% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.6 20.7667163134 253% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.0 7.06120827912 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196649189965 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100148360828 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365120654548 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116358877869 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014200453336 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.9 13.0946893788 213% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.16 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 11.3001002004 198% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.03 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 9.78957915832 276% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.1190380762 225% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 23.0 10.7795591182 213% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.