It is widely said that international sporting competitions such as Olympic sport games play an immense rule in relieving global problems and also contribute to patriotic actions in secure way in this era. To me, this idea seems appealing. Not only would it readily result in closeness of the nations, but it would also lead to achievement of honors for countries.
On the one hand, it is generally debated that international sporting events are viable means to make states more close to each other. Nowadays, there are some political issues that have detrimental effects on the nations relationships. Although creating of some obstacles somehow hinders spread of the peace between countries, their athletes compete with each other with a sense of fair play in sport matches. For example, in 1998 X football international team was present in the football world cup and had competition with countries such as Y and V. Though these countries formerly had some catastrophic political disagreements, these sport competitions had vitally positive effects on smoothing their conflicts subsequently.
On the other hand, when it comes to bringing honors to countries and proud moments for nations, the sport festivals like football world cup is the most appropriate opportunity. Accordingly, Athletes would intensively unify their effort to show their ability distinctively regardless of employing any unfair attitude toward their opponent. Also by conquering success on the behalf of their countries in a competition make the name of their homelands prominent to the world. For example, there are a significant number of small and nameless countries that by being victorious in international competitions annually keep the flag of their countries flying and illustrate the name of them to the inhabitant of this planet.
To sum up, in my personal view, it would be manifestly wise if heads of the states pay more attention to holding international sporting events regularly. Not only would it lead to boos to the relationships among human beings, but it would result in making people acquaintance with different countries.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 65
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
- Some people say that traveling abroad is the way to really learn about another country. However, other people say that it is not necessary to travel as we can find enough information about other countries on the TV or through the internet. Discuss both vi 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... unfair attitude toward their opponent. Also by conquering success on the behalf of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39221556886 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02712378874 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2449651782 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.642857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19297616105 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670225515323 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586645157622 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113613880865 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032218439963 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.