The population of many cities is growing rapidly. What are the effects on people living in these cities? What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people?
It is true that the number of residents in many cities has been rising dramatically. This trend has various negative influences on the lives of people in these cities, and several measures can be taken to address this issue.
The rapid growth of the population of a city has two major effects on its citizens. Firstly, more people means that more vehicles are on the streets, and this leads to a higher level of air pollution. As a result, citizens of populated cities are at a higher risk of health problems, especially respiratory diseases. Those who are living in metropolitans like Shanghai or Beijing in China, for example, always wear face masks when going outdoors due to the heavily polluted atmosphere in these cities which can cause lung cancer. Secondly, if there are too many people living in the same place, there may be more social problems such as high rates of crime, traffic congestion and even road accidents.
To ensure a high quality of life for people in cities with an increasing population, there are many steps that can be taken. The first step would be for governments to promote campaigns which sensitise people to the importance of environmental protection and being more health-conscious. Authorities can also incentivise scientific research, as advances in science and technology are one of the most effective ways to combat environmental pollution. Finally, more job opportunities in the countryside should be created so that many young people will not have the need to move to big cities in search of a well-paid job.
In conclusion, the dramatic increase in the number of inhabitants of many cities mainly negatively affects citizens in two ways, and at least three solutions can be used to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Some people think young people should be free to choose the job that they want while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 89
- Some people think young people should be free to choose the job that they want while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02405498282 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86639139333 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1183212262 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374741769364 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12855441646 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607949008055 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213402574717 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596823142676 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02405498282 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86639139333 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1183212262 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374741769364 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12855441646 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607949008055 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213402574717 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596823142676 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.