With the presence of Internet, school children can easily access for facts, therefore schools should not focus on teaching facts. Some people believe that more focus should be on developing talents and skills, including relationships with others. Discuss this view.
It goes without saying that the Internet has made children's life easier in accessing for facts. While some people believe that schools should focus more on enhancing children's talent, including bonding with others instead of teaching on facts, I would argue that more focus should be on facts teaching instead.
To begin with, teaching facts in school instead of relying on the Internet provides a good source of reliability. The Internet has a wide range of search engines and news platforms. As children’s are still young, they might not be able to differentiate the difference between real and fake news. Consequently, they might assume that everything found on the Internet is reliable. In addition, with teachers teaching facts in schools, they uses a more reliable and validated sources such as printed articles and newspapers, thus it provides more accurate and genuine facts.
On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that schools should focus on developing a child's talent and also their relationships with others. This is because without enhancing those talents; one will never know what they can excel in. For example, a child who has an excellent talent in drawing but was not given any attention to, she will then not be able to excel in becoming a good artist. However, it is difficult for schools to solely focus on teaching specific talent especially when the classes have mix talents of children in it. Although developing of relationship skills can be taught in school, parents should have taught these skills beforehand as good communication skills begin at home. Thus, parents play a major role in educating their children with such skills.
In conclusion, even though teaching facts in schools are beneficial in terms of providing a reliable source, it is essential to have a balance of both teaching facts and enhancing talents in the school curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | tahmeed2019 | 22 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | kiddomiddo | 67 | view |
- The best way to solve the traffic congestion in city is to provide free public transport for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- It is better to be happy than rich Do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 85
- With the presence of Internet, school children can easily access for facts, therefore schools should not focus on teaching facts. Some people believe that more focus should be on developing talents and skills, including relationships with others. Discuss 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...eachers teaching facts in schools, they uses a more reliable and validated sources s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15210355987 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73623399338 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556634304207 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8168807183 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48222016596 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144733251865 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126927808389 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282351105511 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158857213248 0.056905535591 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.