The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
In this day and age, technology emerges and populars in the classroom to support students' study on account of the abundant reference resources, which is expected to totally replace/supplant traditional teachers. Although some fervently advocate this sentiment, I am at loggerheads owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, lessons delivered by technology are obviously less interesting than those offered by a human. This can be explained by the fact that a teacher, in the process of giving a lecture, shows their wide array of facial expressions in conjunction with body language attracting listeners, which “the machines” can not perform. As a result, the more exciting the studying time is, the higher concentrated students are, which is in proportion to the higher probability of acquiring the knowledge.
Further and even more prominently, a real teacher estimates and classifies their students more accurately than technologies. Apart from knowledge, students’ manners are of paramount importance to education criteria. Perceptibly, technologies just evaluate students’ comprehension by essays submitted or examinations, which only gives correct results in a certain point of time. Conversely, throughout face-to-face interaction during a long term, a teacher is able to give objective justifications about the learning process including not only the level of absorbing knowledge but also learners’ behavior performed in the school environment.
Last but not least, technology can not take over the inspirational role from a teacher. Perceivably, an industrious teacher offers students knowledge as well as learning motivation. It is due to the fact that nothing, except ambitious instructors, can uncover coarse talents by recognizing students’ strengths and weaknesses. Simultaneously, the young generations seem to admire teachers’ erudition and determine to pursue their passion.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the benefits of technology, I ascertain that on no account can a traditional teacher be replaced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Hidu | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eference resources, which is expected to totally replace/supplant traditional tea...
^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher concentrated students are, which is in proportion to the higher probability ...
^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from knowledge, students’ manners are of paramount importance to education criter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, well, apart from, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89898989899 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4549228271 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646464646465 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6882535703 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276670864455 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828423453575 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533720016312 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129549560116 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436895152718 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.