At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages

In recent years, there are more population of younger people than older people while having many youth people do have some deficits these are negligible compared to the benefits. This essay will discuss why the advantages of younger adults for nations do in fact outweigh the disadvantages.

There are two primary reasons why younger individuals will make a huge difference to their countries economy. Firstly, the youth generation people have fresh exciting ideas for the business. For example, most companies are hiring new promising talents who are having good thinking abilities. Secondly, they can learn much faster than old age people although they are skilful people. For instance, they can solve problems easily and they are good at communication skills. However, it is very useful for the growth of any business. Overall, younger people are crucial for their nations because of their abilities to fix any errors and fresh ideas.

There are several cons to why older people are important. If the population of younger adults are large so there is less experience in the country. Despite having plenty of ideas, they will not get success because of a lack of experience. Moreover, they do not know how to execute the plans in order to achieve success in particular fields. In addition, being more excited can cause arrogance, which leads to major problems for business and the country. In short, because of the lack of experience and impatience behaviour, older people might make an impact.

It is increasingly likely that youth generation individuals are better for their country in some fields. Nevertheless, there has been required to have old age people for safe future. Ultimately, there are plenty of advantages of young adults for upcoming years.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in particular, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18881118881 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61105246834 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.824191931 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4444444444 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162443020128 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053415730246 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523649091066 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121383809078 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725796037972 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in particular, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18881118881 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61105246834 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541958041958 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.824191931 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4444444444 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162443020128 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053415730246 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523649091066 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121383809078 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725796037972 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.