The prevention of health problems and health illnesses is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that government funding should be allocated to preventive measures as they are more essential than medical treatments. From my perspective, there is little to disagree about such an approach due to its sustainability and cost-effectiveness compared to the risky and costly treatments.
While it is undeniable that treatment and medicine are crucial, relying on them is a high-risk and exorbitant approach. Admittedly, medical care serves as a savior to thousands of lives. However, I would argue that medical care is not highly advanced enough to guarantee ailments are eliminated. There is a considerable probability of medical and technical errors as the number of able medical practitioners is limited. A compelling example can be seen in cardiovascular surgery, in which despite preoperative risk stratification, patients undergoing such surgery remain at high risk of death. Additionally, getting access to medical treatment may cost a fortune to many low-income individuals. This is mainly because the more severe the diseases are, the more astronomical amount of money spent on facilities and medical staff is.
On the other hand, the prevention of potential diseases is more sustainable and economical. Scientifically, human well-being tends to be reinforced and maintained as both their resistance and immune system are enhanced when applying efficacious preventive measures such as daily exercising and a healthy diet. Effective prevention also restricts the number of patients, which helps to improve the productivity of medical treatments conducted and mitigate the burden shouldered by medical staff. Vietnam's strategies towards the Covid-19 pandemic perfectly exemplifies this. As there has been no cure for such disease, self-quarantine, facemasks, and hand sanitizer are of paramount importance. Considering the potential virtues, governments should adopt prompt preventive methods to yield optimal results. For instance, every resident should be made eligible for vaccines before possible infection.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge the importance of treatment, I would contend that effective preventive methods which have more long-lasting effects should be prioritized in terms of funding.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82012195122 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33409900362 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631097560976 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7055919678 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160014319001 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495582203907 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523115903171 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105790382132 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302965330643 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.