providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, to assist poor society with amount of money is great action ,however, this case could rise the poverty rate. I personally share the same perspective of this view for several reasons which I will explain in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, providing humanity aid is very useful to the poor as a social being, they not only lead a miserable life but also have to get the same right as other people. To exemplify, a number of shopping voucher can be shared to fulfil the daily needs. Furthermore, if capital expenditure is not distributed, those people will be more confused how to change the future. With financial support, such group of societies could take advantage of this situation ,perhaps, it is possible to open some businesses such as, street food and grocery store. In which, this would be the way to solve financial issue to achieve better family income.
On the other hand, those people divert this opportunity carelessly, leading them to become less productive and also they unlikely increase a living expectancy. For example, the fund gives them dependency that the low-income inhabitants could earn their own money only by asking without hard-working. In addition, This triggers a lot of fraud case since there are several groups abusing this occasion to self-enriched. These days, the club creates some charity events with the reason of caring for each other, In fact, there is no such donation result which is contributed by those groups.
In conclusion, in my opinion, delivering financial support has important role to the poor people including the unproductive way of living and the higher level of fake charitable organization. This is as long as the result of donation is benefited wisely by the poor.
- Some people feel that individual should try to assimilate completely to the country where they live while others feel it more important to perseve their native culture Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that car free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution However others argue that there are other ways that are more effective Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit the teenagers and the community as well Do you agree disagree 61
- providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some places old age is valued while in other countries youth is considered more important discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ety with amount of money is great action ,however, this case could rise the povert...
^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I personally share the same perspective of this view for several reasons which I...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun shopping seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much shopping', 'a good deal of shopping'.
Suggestion: much shopping; a good deal of shopping
...me right as other people. To exemplify, a number of shopping voucher can be shared to fulfil the dai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s could take advantage of this situation ,perhaps, it is possible to open some bus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03793103448 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72092564861 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631034482759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8966251403 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103043388742 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034659246348 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323803335365 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637005292376 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329382065464 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.