Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited recource on expensive high-teach media such as software, videos or DVDs
Libraries are only place where people can find all types of books. Most of people believe that public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resource on expensive high-teach media such as software, videos or DVDs. I completely agree with this statement because librarians should attract everybody and store different types of books.
Reading a book is important for our life. But every child is not interested in reading books so librarian should poster books and attract them. For instance, everyone interest advertised books and try to read them. Therefore, librarian play the most big role, which to read a book.
To read books improve our brain development and creativity, so libraries are becoming vital part of our life. Libraries store different types of books which they search. For instance, if people want to read a book, they can go to the library. Therefore, libraries are the most basic place in our life.
In conclusion, libraries should improve are more their status for humanity rather than high-teach media such as electronic books or tv
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-05 | Dilmurod Abdullaev | 56 | view |
- These days a lot of young people are turning into the streets of the crime what are the reasons for this and how can it be tackled 56
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 73
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...ere people can find all types of books. Most of people believe that public libraries should pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 41.998997996 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 1615.20841683 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 176.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15909090909 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54342451519 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.8401722228 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5454545455 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347634038785 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122015600005 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140109379411 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229610405311 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137193556096 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 78.4519038076 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.