Q 19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development Some people think that financial aid is important Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important Discuss both these

Essay topics:

Q 19: Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Recently, the question of how to support emerging countries has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that financial assistance for less-developed nations should take precedence over practical help and advice, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.

On the one hand, those who claim that financial support benefits thrid world countries a great deal do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that an astronomical amount of money is needed to establish a high quality of infrastructure, including railways and roads, which makes it possible for developing countries to invigorate economic growth. In fact, poorer nations are incapable of affording to construct facilities without monetary aid from global charities. In addition, a multitude of citizens in Africa are suffering from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced meals. If it were not for donations for socially disadvantaged people, they would have difficulty leading a better life.

On the other hand, others contend that more emphasis should be placed on practical help and technical advice than monetary support. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that although it seems beneficial for global charitable institutions to provide poorer countries with vast sums of money in the short term, developed nations having numerous invaluable skills and experiences derived from trial and error should teach these to emerging countries. This is because receiving numerous pieces of advice and useful knowledge enables them not only to boost economical and political progress but also to become less dependent on other countries in the long term. Furthermore, the majority of less-developed countries are experiencing high levels of corruption preventing the masses from having an improved standard of living. If they obtain advice from experts in global foundations, this phenomenon would be alleviated.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-09 idid382021 84 view
2022-08-09 idid382021 84 view
2022-08-08 idid382021 84 view
2022-08-07 idid382021 89 view
2021-09-22 idid382002 89 view
Essays by user idid382003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49862258953 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90545206092 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63085399449 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5342574811 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185289456547 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533226356225 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480649701154 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100345923099 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062685346695 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.