Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Recently, whether an increase in online business meetings and training sessions for employees is beneficial has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some advantages to participating in business meetings on the Internet, these are outweighed by the disadvantages, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that working people can benefit a great deal from attending online business meetings. Proponents of this argument insist that the development of technology has revolutionised the way workers can communicate with colleagues regardless of time and place considering that having access to the Internet is only needed. Furthermore, working adults can save time because commuting to and from work deprives them of a huge amount of time that would otherwise be spent on devotion to work.
My opinion, however, is that it seems short-sighted to contend that holding business meetings on the Internet merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that online meetings prevent employees from receiving instant feedback from their co-workers in person, which often leads them to have difficulty concentrating on their meetings. In other words, workers are more likely to struggle to have a tight grasp of their duties, exerting a detrimental influence on their work performance. In addition, to provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for face-to-face meetings for employees, it would be nearly impossible for them to build strong relationships with their colleagues as well as senior managers helping them develop interpersonal skills that will be invaluable in their future careers. To be more specific, mingling with others at the workplace enables them not only to feel a sense of belonging but also to strengthen their bonds. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the drawbacks of partaking in online meetings surpass the benefits for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | hellielts | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q6 Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means that they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of time to do what they want What is your opinion 84
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Q20 The family has a great influence on children s development but the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part in children s life Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the draw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3651226158 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97557914208 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9282866623 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.266666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169557879491 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571143951282 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526789004437 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952814928281 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520701275159 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.