Q1 Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in international tourism. Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the issue of global tourism has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that tourism should not be discouraged as the development of global tourism exerts a positive influence on local communities, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from a rise in global tourism. Perhaps the principal benefit is that the advancement of the tourism industry can stimulate economic growth in local countries considering that tourism attracts investment from international corporations and governments. In addition, tourism creates a multitude of employment opportunities in building facilities and updating infrastructures, including railways and roads, which makes it possible for local residents to land a job with greater ease.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that a rise in the tourism sector merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that developments in global tourism pose a threat to the local environment. As an illustration, one notable natural heritage site designated by UNESCO in South Korea had a myriad of endangered species of birds. However, the majority of these species became extinct in 2010 as numerous overseas visitors produced a huge amount of garbage, which caused damage to that habitat. Furthermore, some foreign travellers have a predisposition to commit vandalism, which places a heavy financial burden on local governments since they have to spend astronomical amounts of money in restoring damaged tourist attractions. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44207317073 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07976782956 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2189178533 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207164466438 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608297849587 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057713417938 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114654622869 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704974313648 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.