Q10 Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your opinion

Technology development is claimed to be a reason for environmental issues, therefore some people suggested that individuals should live a simple life instead of overusing technology while others believed that technology could save us from pollution. personally, I think this factor has 2 sides, improving the quality of life and causing environmental problems but these problems are particularly from human purposes and awareness.

On one hand, it is no doubt that human being demand is increasing, leading to the situation that technology is used uncontrolled and causes pollution. considering the appearance of the vehicle, especially a private one is the most striking evidence of air pollution caused by the technology development. In addition, it is obvious that the higher technology applied, the more efficient that the factory's machines could work. hence, the raising in the amount of CO2 emissions, released into the atmosphere which could cause pollution issues. these arguments cited the importance of the simple life to reduce the using of environmental harmful technology, that people should take into consideration.

on the other hand, it is quite unfair to blame technology growth to be the main reason of pollution because these problems are particularly from the overconsumption of humans while some environmental problems need technology to solve. Recently the awareness about global pollution is rising constantly, and tend to use technology devices to deal which pollution problems such as solar panel energy, wind power, or even nuclear power instead of the traditional energy from coal-burning. The other side of technological development is clear and serious that it is important to consider the role of technology in social demands. I think there should be a restriction on the overusing technology for production and life services while encouraging the use of these for environmental saving.

In conclusion, the advantages of technology seem to outweigh the disadvantages and it is clearly because of human consumption. therefore, human demand should be taken into consideration instead of technology.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...echnology could save us from pollution. personally, I think this factor has 2 sides, impro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
...used uncontrolled and causes pollution. considering the appearance of the vehicle, especial...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
... that the factorys machines could work. hence, the raising in the amount of CO2 emiss...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ere which could cause pollution issues. these arguments cited the importance of the s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ople should take into consideration. on the other hand, it is quite unfair to b...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...s clearly because of human consumption. therefore, human demand should be taken into cons...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59259259259 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21166854062 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7384522088 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327635510141 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116880472643 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089962743871 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203968807323 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125932077977 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.