Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment

Essay topics:

Q8: As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?

Recently, whether an increase in the number of cars is beneficial has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to making use of cars for the environment, these are outweighed by the advantages for human beings, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.

On the one hand, those who claim that a rise in the number of personal vehicles poses a threat to the environment do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that a huge amount of CO2 released by cars exerts a detrimental influence on the quality of air. In other words, excessive use of private vehicles leads to air pollution preventing living creatures, including humans and plants, from having an improved standard of living. Furthermore, numerous endangered species of wildlife that should be protected in order to keep biodiversity can become extinct given that a large quantity of carbon dioxide accelerates the speed of global warming, which can even give rise to climate change.

My opinion, however, is that mankind can reap a myriad of advantages from the availability of personal vehicles. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that owning a car facilitates various aspects of people's daily life, from taking trips to commuting to and from work. To be more specific, employees are able to travel to their workplace with greater ease as passengers of public transport often spend a great deal of time. This is because public transport systems are sometimes not only unavailable but also crowded. In addition, individuals' cars can minimise their inconvenience during their travel since they do not need to take into account problems related to public transport, such as being limited to fixed routes and timetables. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of using private vehicles for individual people surpass the drawbacks for the environment for the reasons discussed above.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-08 idid382021 84 view
2022-08-07 idid382021 89 view
2022-08-03 hellielts 89 view
2022-06-23 nguyendangquang.aspect 84 view
2021-10-24 minhquanvn 78 view
Essays by user idid382003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.835248528 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622282608696 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2993353307 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314494674124 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815294532143 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076470429892 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173675306149 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545425335151 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19565217391 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.835248528 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622282608696 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2993353307 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314494674124 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815294532143 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076470429892 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173675306149 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545425335151 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.