The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich, do you agree or disagree?
these days, as we live in temporary and technology era, the gap between the destitute and the prosperous society increased dramatically since there is a major development in technology. In accordance with this statement, this essay will explain the point of view of this issue and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the argument above, I do appreciate to the statement which believed that the existence of technology renders a gap in between the affluent persons and impoverished people. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that the presence of these modern aspects will decrease a gap in between them and it is additionally going to bestow other positive impacts for both sides. thus, I tend to disagree to the opinion of this issue.
According to my perspective above, there are numerous reasons of why I assumed something like this. The existence of it, first and foremost, will make economically deprived individuals and wealthy people to be able to work together at the same place. Therefore, the gap between them will not be as high as other persons thought. second but not less crucial, it, furthermore, will provide them the same opportunity to utilize it properly, thereby, I do not feel that it will worsen the gap between both of them.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that the presence of technology is not always giving a negative influence to the gap in between the prosperous and the less affluent individuals. thus, I tend to consider that it is better for us to think about something from the other sides and do not follow the common opinion in order to see a positive thing which is unable to be seen.
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 84
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 67
- Line graph : wheat exports 1985 – 1990. (Canada, Australia, European community) 100
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 73
- Bar Chart : Percentage Participate of men in senior development position. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
these days, as we live in temporary and techn...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... other positive impacts for both sides. thus, I tend to disagree to the opinion of t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...ot be as high as other persons thought. second but not less crucial, it, furthermore, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...rous and the less affluent individuals. thus, I tend to consider that it is better f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86315789474 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84274629981 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522807017544 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3675622173 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196722293319 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772598182738 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616958835336 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121509144209 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355284247649 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.