The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012.
The figure elucidates the percentage of parliament’s female members in several European nations between 2000 and 2012. At first glance, it is evident that Belgium experienced different pattern in comparison with other states.
To begin with, 2000 to 2012 witnessed a significant upsurge for the number of female members of parliament in Germany and France where it stood approximately at a quarter for France and at just below 35% for Germany and terminated to well beneath four-tenths for both countries. Following the same pattern as the first two nations, the percentage of female members of parliament in Italy and the UK additionally uplifted tremendously from 2000, which made up at just above a fourth for Italy and at just under 5% for the UK, to 2012, which constituted roughly to just below eight-twentieths and just over a fifth respectively.
In contrast, there was a considerable palpitation in Belgium. It, initially, upright positioned at just across 15% and peaked to just less than 25%, unexpectedly, it plunging remarkably, plummeting to just above two-tenths by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-15 | alifdores | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | Mia Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2017-09-27 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Some people believe that computer help to make the world better place. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 78
- Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 84
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorernations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility forhelping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2625698324 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20657738251 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608938547486 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.334025468 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.0 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231604695246 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119661274077 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142522287776 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155244325385 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112185658794 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.