Reading makes a man wise. Reading comics helps children to develop reading habits in their initial stages. But some people believe that reading comics spoils the young ones. This essay disagrees with this statement owing to the following facts.
Firstly, most of the children listen to good stories from their parents or teachers in their early childhood. After attaining the ability to read, the little ones try to read storybooks. In the initial stages, they do not try to read encyclopedia or newspapers. Comics are the evergreen favorite of all the children all over the world.
Secondly, since comic books follow conversation patterns, most of them attract children tremendously. The spectacular picturization of stories enhances their creativity. Apart from that, they help them to boost up logical thinking, imagination, linguistic skills and provide entertainment and so on.
However, some opponents argue that reading comics adversely affect juveniles. They say so because some children get addicted and lose interest in intellectual reading and badly affects their academic performance. Even if it is so, by proper guidance and strict supervision of parents and teachers, the above-mentioned problems can be alleviated, without disturbing their interest in reading. So their argument is neither reasonable nor powerful.
In conclusion, even though there exist some minor defects, reading comics is still the best door to develop a good reading habit. Therefore, it can be suggested that reading comics under the guidance of elder people seems to be good for children to keep a good reading habit by avoiding its darker sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t door to develop a good reading habit. Therefore it can be suggested that reading comics...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46274509804 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81646720286 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3162240776 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9411764706 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230593563975 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768134324287 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533120776041 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136978228749 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717262348078 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.