In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes that have occurred? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Recently, there has been many substantial shifts among the family structure along with its task delegation. Nonetheless, the most remarkable alternation must be the increase of nuclear family as well as the participation of female in labour forces. To my perspective, these transformation are absolutely advantagoeus.
Regarding the family structure, there has been an unevitable tendency in residents nowaday that they prefer to live in a smaller family, which includes not up to 3 generations in a family. Specifically, living in a nuclear family can improve one’s life standard when the budget burden becomes lighter and the citizens can be able to take care of their members more decently. As an example, parents in a nuclear family have more time to focus on their children as well as stronger finance to support their studying, in comparision with others
On the other hand, family responsibilities also witnessed a drastic rise in the number of female workers that involved in different sorts of careers. In detail, there are many jobs that used to be prejudiced as not compatible with women such as lawyer, doctor or professor. Since they did not posess sufficent qualification or potential to do these works. Nevertheless, looking at our society nowadays, it can be easily observed that there are no such jobs that only require male labours anymore. As a result, the equality between 2 genders is more and more improved, leading to a better citivilized world.
In conclusion, throughout a period of development, there must be some curtain renovations in our society, especially our family structure and its duties. Furthermore, I suppose that these transformation are really positive and essential to build up a better environment for human-being
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 78
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this transformation' or 'these transformations'?
Suggestion: this transformation; these transformations
...le in labour forces. To my perspective, these transformation are absolutely advantagoeus. Regardi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this transformation' or 'these transformations'?
Suggestion: this transformation; these transformations
...its duties. Furthermore, I suppose that these transformation are really positive and essential to bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, regarding, so, well, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29537366548 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12153405775 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8788517707 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145528592902 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495010243867 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338137968573 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901112053259 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289626286038 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.