We must admit that technology has infiltrated in almost all field of life and work. This also means that there are many radical changes in the fields of agriculture too. Lot of technology is used for the improvement of crops. However, this has lead to divided opinions; where a group of people believe that it is essential, while a few others believe that it can be damaging and so we must use the traditional ways of farming. Therefore, before commenting on my decision, both view will be analysed further.
Focussing on the first view, the most important argument the supporters put forward is that of the increasing demand. Due to explosion of the world population within the last century, the traditional methods are largely insufficient to provide food to all, and so the use of technology and the concept of factory farming are welcomed. Besides this, we need more efficient methods of farming. This is because several countries in Asia and Africa suffer from long spell of droughts and famines. This means that people would starve if genetically modified crops are not grown. The innovation implementation have saved many lives. Moreover, the sector of agriculture has less manpower than the past and therefore, technology has proved a boon to intake farming less intensive.
On the other hand, the latter view points out the risks. To begin with, some say that this can pose a serious threat to the health of the individuals and the environment. Many fear that changes in farming methods can diminish the nutritional value of the produce and can be a sources of some may lose its fertility gradually. The other drawback that is considered is that the original species may slowly disappear and this can change aspects such as the taste, color, appearance, and the quality of food.
To conclude and give my opinion, I would support the former opinion more that the latter. Although, there are a few drawbacks, it is a fact that with changes in the farming methods due to technology, the world has definitely become efficient to satisfy the growing demands. However, care should be taken to preserve the original species and the nutritional value in the food.
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and incl 78
- Traditional medicine, such as acupuncture and herbal remedies, is very popular in some countries. Those who practise traditional medicine claim that it is better than modern medicine in maintaining and improving health.Do you agree or disagree with this v 61
- Some people think that there are benefits in going to private secondary schools. Others feel that private schools can have negative effects on the society.Discuss both the view and give your opinion? 78
- in recent years, farming practice has changed to include methods such as factory farming and the use of technology to improve crops. Some people believe that these development are neccessary, which others regard them as ddangerous and advocate a return to 67
- Some people think that new technology is improving the lives of workers, other say it has more disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fear seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many fears'.
Suggestion: Many fears
...of the individuals and the environment. Many fear that changes in farming methods can dim...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a source' or simply 'sources'?
Suggestion: a source; sources
...itional value of the produce and can be a sources of some may lose its fertility graduall...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68818581543 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4491186584 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0526315789 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197000251443 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052298462772 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544724317607 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110060062513 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273169416626 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.