In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in some public places such as bars, restuarants and offices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places?
It is quite irritable that, if someone is smoking beside of you which is considered morally wrong. Fortunately, most of the governments have already taken some neseccary steps by imposing some fine for people who smoke in public places, such as bars, restuarants and offices as to, prevent non smokers from any dangerous of passive smoking. Persanally I am for the idea of banning smoking in public places. As a result it could bring lots of benefits for everyone.
There are several advantages of restricting people to smoke in public places. The main one is that, it helps them to be clean and immaculate which also play a significant role in every societies. For instance, tourists could realize how the economy of a country when they visit there for the first time. It means it has a huge affect on appealing tourists in order to develop a country. If residients of a country go on soiling their places by smoking and throwing away remains of cigaratte, the country can face multitude of difficulties related to economic growth.
One more benefit of it could be that, it can reduce the number of resperatery diseases on people coming out via passive smoking. Although you are non smoker there is an enormous damage to you more than a person who is smoking near you. Thus, the government are supposed to make this restrictions forever as to, decline the number of illnesses. In my opinion it could also help many smokers to give their habits of smoking.
By banning smoking in public places, everyone could achieve a healthy life and live longer.
One of the reasons why I agree with statement, written above, as people, who are tired of working long hours, deliberately go to bars and restuarants to wind up not to have some kind of disease. Because of this law, restuarants and workplaces have become free of naughty fumes of tobacco.
To conclude, having taken all the concequences and damages of smoking into account, many governments have prohibited people from smoking in the majority of places where people go there to relax or work. In likelkhood the number of people who smoke could considerably decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | Sardorbek 7117 | 48 | view |
- In recent years many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in some public places such as bars restuarants and offices To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places 48
- More and more people are relying on the private cars as their means of transportation. Describe some of the problems overeliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least one possible solution. 73
- If you want to save the future of the planet, we all should drastically change our way of life?What is your opinion? 61
- These days, people work in more than one job and often change career several times during their life.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 56
- The line chart bow shows the results of a survey giving reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and maje comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 word 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... the first time. It means it has a huge affect on appealing tourists in order to develop ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people coming out via passive smoking. Although you are non smoker there is an enormous...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'enormous damage'.
Suggestion: enormous damage
...g. Although you are non smoker there is an enormous damage to you more than a person who is smokin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, as to, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87052341598 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66357993608 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550964187328 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1035320468 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299157566238 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843097629234 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748050689234 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151576159209 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060573755921 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.