Recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by around fifty per cent over the last fifty years. What can we do to help protect the wildlife round the world?
It is quite important to keep a natural balance of every species to avoid mishaps. Shockingly, the world has experienced the loss of animals and other species during the recent five decades for fifty per cent. I believe this can be controlled by alerting on natural disasters and implementing strong punishment against hunting natural resources.
First of all, regular monitoring and researches should be done to predict and control the natural calamities like wildfire etcetera by authorities to improve the number of forest species. To put it in another way, the governments have to send environmentalists and other experts to learn and find out possible disasters to the prone areas. As a result, if any warning is made the proper initiations will be possible to save the most valuable resources of the planet earth. It is recently noticed that, for example, the wildfire took place in the Amazon forest contributed to the devastation of thousands of animals and other species. It is impossible to limit the loss unless proper planning and actions are taken place in advance.
Secondly, another action to be taken place on the preservation of these natural resources is to implement strong rules against the people who are a threat to these living asset. In other words, people are either greedy or wanted to enjoy in its peak. For the purpose, there many people around the globe including celebrities, enjoy hunting and hurting which resulted in the mass loss of the resource. It shouldn't be solved unless proper punishment systems are provided against these misdeeds. To cite an example, a famous Indian actor, Salman Khan has been to court many times as an aftermath of hunting deer. If these types of actions are taken place against all the lawbreakers without considering their fame and name it will be a great help to those who share the earth with us.
By analysing the possible actions to keep and secure the most valuable natural resources, proper planning against natural calamities and treating the lawbreakers as they deserve are the best possible solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Ehsan BAKHTIYARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | AFSAL | 11 | view |
- the table shows under ground railways in six cities. 11
- Writing task 1 a letter Write a letter to your friend who lives in a different country about your plan to work overseas In your letter say What jobs do you plan to do Why do you want to work overseas Ask for some information related to jobs such as salary 92
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures? 78
- The amount of time spend on sport and exercise should be increased in school in order to tackle the problem of overweight children? Do you think this the best way to deal with the problem? What other solutions can you suggest? 67
- Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only way of teaching students, however, nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online. This causes many people to believe that the lecture system will not be needed in the fu 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sasters to the prone areas. As a result, if any warning is made the proper initia...
^^
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ed in the mass loss of the resource. It shouldnt be solved unless proper punishment syst...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09037900875 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.700020132 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536443148688 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1592758984 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0547635073308 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196598098698 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466483567971 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367827819163 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459886595042 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.