Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
An often contested subject is global environmental degradation, and every time you flick through the pages of a newspaper, you encounter with this debated topic. One school of thought suggests that the government ought to take fundamental steps to hammer out this issue. However, others claim that it is up to individuals. I firmly hold the belief that the government is responsible for this challenge. Analaysing legislation and financial factors will authenticate that the administration s' responsibility is quite superior to individual's.
To begin with, formulating new and practical policies are in authorities' domain. For instance, toward the over-rising number of industry sectors the government could implement roles to restrict them. As a matter of fact, post-industrial-revolution
factories are the main origin of the ecosystem devastation. Therefore, merely the government is able to impose specific regulation to minimise hazards original from factories.
On the other, fighting out the pollution and environmental deterioration inescapable requires a vast amount of money, thereby, the government is obligated to afford the financial burden to secure human beings. As an illustration, resolving and reversing the perturbing trend of global warming is the high-cost project. This approach requires an enormous number of spacecraft to being released above the earth as a sunshade which is funding by the government of Russia. It means that heavy monetary demand for reducing biosphere damage are in authorities purview, and surely it is out of individual s' touch.
To conclude what has been looked at, authorities are playing a crucial role in declining environmental destructing. Thus, if the politicians establish policies and invest money for counteracting the danger, per person would not sort out the problem individually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | PardissRS | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | vudinhthuyornot | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 84 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social roblems,as well as practicle problems to what extend do you agree or with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 89
- all over the world the number of overweight people is growing what do you think are the main causes of this what are effects 96
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter of fact, post-industrial-revolution factories are the main origin of the eco...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69927536232 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45829679758 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6694544395 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164624735636 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449646571088 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306893603711 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702835130285 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458805583055 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.