Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government is responsible for, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
In many parts of the world, a school of thoughts believes that the pollution of environment caused by the carrying of products and people by many modes of transportation should be supported by the government. Others, in contrast, suppose it is the problems which can be addressed by individuals. I personally subscribe to the latter owning to the merits of that in its effectiveness, supplying both merchandise and people on time and both views will be outlined below.
On the one hand, the majority of transportation company can be supplied with scores of new electric vehicles which may not preserve the environment by reducing the amount of emission. To be more specific, the government intervention will help companies to change all their vehicles more quickly in comparison with the changes of each company. The assistant of the government may be a game-changer of many nations having the sustainable environment.
On the other hand, it is beneficial for every single transportation company in terms of time and economy if they take a main role in solving environment problems arose when they transport goods and people, boosting income and saving time by actively buying new hybrid vehicles and devoting money to local authorities to repairing the infrastructure system of their cities. These responsibilities will enhance the effectiveness in enhancing the environment quality.
Finally, I concur with statement that every company should have mutual understanding and cooperation with their government conserving the environment actively. This responsibility will help to diminish the sources and time for both of them. The government is able to enact legislation which open opportunities to their companies to protect the ecosystem.
In conclusion, the upsides in saving sources and time of actively preserving the environment of each company are weightier than that of overly depending on the government. The government may abolish several fees for changing from the oil-based vehicles to the electric ones.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that government should invest money in science education rather than other subjects to develop country 84
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Other think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and give 84
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir companies to protect the ecosystem. In conclusion, the upsides in saving sou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, so, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4253968254 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21256038351 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8278497659 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.461538462 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163096644018 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563882758652 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509596720538 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877690396548 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490335050728 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.