The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, opposing ideas have been put forward regarding whether to restore ancient buildings or not. This essay aims to explore both perspectives and elucidate why I firmly believe that historical things are extremely valuable not only that countries but also to almost the whole world.
On the one hand, the restoration of aged buildings has many historical values. Through this, international friends must realize that in the past, we have been a nation, with a high
spirit of solidarity. In fact, the knowledge that war remains bring us are practical things, we use that to educate future generations, remind them to always remember what happened and be proud of our victory. Moreover, these buildings also contain numerous cultural values. Hoi An Ancient Town sets a great sample here, it attracts a large number of tourists from almost all over the world. This helps our country promote economic activities.
On the other hand, opponents of this way believe that restoring immemorial places requires a huge amount of effort and resources including human resources and money. To repair a building, the essential thing we need is an in-depth investigation of the site. The more the lack of knowledge, the greater the consequences. Instead of doing that work, building new houses and roads is more beneficial. This can develop the infrastructure of big cities so that attract more tourists and thus promote tourism.
Nevertheless, it is my view that when and only when the restoration is actually needed. Otherwise, the government should spend money on conducting projects that have many advantages to striking a balance so that develop the country grows stronger every day.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I am utterly convinced that the historical relic is the echo of the past, a living witness in the war. Therefore, in any country, they must be preserved and respected. Besides, repairing old buildings is also important, however, the government should give the best decision to keep the balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | gtuez | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | baoquyen1906 | 84 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog 61
- The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 73
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Advertising is becoming more and more common in everyday life Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past, we have been a nation, with a high spirit of solidarity. In fact, the knowl...
^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n sets a great sample here, it attracts a large number of tourists from almost all over the world...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19345238095 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78974163245 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6025892337 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242956213673 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642063051748 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573966846008 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107927979293 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407086833987 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.