It is a fact that reconstruction old buildings have to spend plenty of public funding from the national treasury. Therefore, some people think that governments should spend that money to build a new house and improve the road. Personally, I disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, some people believe that spending money builds new houses and improve roads which is better than maintenance old buildings. If the government does not rebuild some old buildings, they do not need to collect money from their residents. For example, people have to pay lots of money for tax for other problems in their life. Therefore, if governments reconstruct some old buildings, this will bring some heavy stress for taxpayers.
On the other hand, I believe that the value of time-honored buildings in reflecting cultural identity is significant which cannot measure by money. For example, some old buildings had to build in a long time ago and restored the value of cultural traditions. Therefore, old buildings show the history of their own country. Finally, governments should remain old buildings are because of great economic value. For example, attracting numerous people who live far away from those old buildings and foreigners who often want to explore and learn about different cultures in other nations. Therefore, this can make some old buildings become one of the most tourist destinations. It can create lots of jobs for unemployed and increasing economics in some local areas.
To sum up, while some people think that the government should use the money to develop a new house and road than using public finance for renovation old constructions.
- AN increasing number of people are buying what the need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online? 61
- https://www.testbig.com/sites/default/files/35726209_834780890050275_639... 11
- the table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998
- some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, therefore, while, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16356877323 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74752627847 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9940735863 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257639007845 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104033045599 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653849332674 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192924167033 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352440369791 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.