A hundreds of thousands of people are undergoing pandemic poverty in many of the developing countries. It is often believed that the developed countries should provide financial aid or lend their support by sharing resources required for basic needs like food, medicine, clothing. On the other hand, some argue that the government of the poor nation should provide its citizens with their needs. Although this is a highly contoversial issue, I firmly believe that the authority of the poorer nations is the right agent in this case.
Firstly, the reason behind people lacking basic amenities like food, education is because of the lack of good governance which results in corrupt politicians. This leads to the exploitation of resources for their own selfish needs. It is obvious that the affluent government nations will not knock on the doors of the poor deprived people, it is therefore the government of that nation only which can ensure the fundamental needs of the people.
Secondly, many empirical evidencies shed light on that the wealthy nations are unable to sustainably develop the poor nations. If good governance prevails then the people are able to elevate thier living standards by manging fundamental needs. For example, Nicargua and Vietnam had been suffering conflicts and both were helped with foreign aid. But on the contrary, Vietnam was able to conquer poverty and provide for its people while Nicargua is still struggling with its ailing economy.
Hence to conclude, it is obvious that foreign aid is a tool with only a limited ability to trigger growth without good governance. Therefore the government of the poor countries should practice good governance to ensure basic needs and a healthy future of its citiens and its nation.
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- Process the lifecycle of a butterfly 11
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'A hundred'
Suggestion: A hundred
A hundreds of thousands of people are undergoing p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A hundred' or simply 'hundreds'?
Suggestion: A hundred; Hundreds
A hundreds of thousands of people are undergoing p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o sustainably develop the poor nations. If good governance prevails then the peopl...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... struggling with its ailing economy. Hence to conclude, it is obvious that foreign...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...trigger growth without good governance. Therefore the government of the poor countries sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18947368421 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62231351339 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540350877193 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7278514832 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135541961536 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475897528457 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533563471786 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879787325672 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583094705915 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.