Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While financial aid to the developing as well as undeveloped countries from the rich countries helps in development, it does not solve the issue of poverty. Hence, developed countries should focus more on different kind of helps. Keeping in mind that "money does not solve everything", it is agreeable that developed countries should give other types of help, for example education or health, too rather than providing just money.
Undeveloped countries often do not have stable economies. Therefore, the financial help from other countries would help in solving many economical problems. When a country is facing a depression or economical meltdown in severe case, any monetory grant or even a loan from rich country may help in maintaining the cashflow of the country. Consequently, the country can come out of such economical crisis. From this example, it can be seen that financial aid can be beneficial for a poor country.
Although the money from a friendly country help the economy and development, it does not solve all the problems. Firstly, the primary requirements of citizens of any country is food, cloths and accomodations. Moreover, education and health facilities are equally important. If, rather than providing direct money, a developed country invests in schools, colleges and hospitals then the people of the country can benefit a lot. This can directly affect the living standard of people.
Secondly, if a country were to establish new industries in developing country, they would be able to produce at cheaper price compared to their home contry. On the other hand, the developing country can gain largely by creation of new jobs, getting products at a lower cost etc. This type of aids are win-win for both of the countries and help the poor country develop significanly.
In conclusion, considering the arguments presented, it is clear that while financial aids to undeveloped country are beneficial, the other different types of help would do much more good.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-24 | Gaila Moraes | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | Sprios_D | 47 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. has been updated. 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- he diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...er countries would help in solving many economical problems. When a country is facing a de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ently, the country can come out of such economical crisis. From this example, it can be se...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.296875 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9268407002 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534375 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7072967078 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7058823529 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490475404945 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164219953587 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103079860771 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285128871149 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976932681394 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.